Show simple item record

contributor authorSuryeon Kim
contributor authorPrashnna Ghimire
contributor authorH. David Jeong
contributor authorPhilip Barutha
date accessioned2024-04-27T22:45:46Z
date available2024-04-27T22:45:46Z
date issued2024/06/01
identifier other10.1061-JCEMD4.COENG-13932.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297432
description abstractThe construction industry consists of various sectors that have different needs and functions. Those sector-specific differences create different risks that construction professionals empirically know. However, there is no documented and unbiased assessment to validate the empirical knowledge. Identifying the varying spectrum of risks present in different construction sectors in a systematic manner can facilitate more effective and efficient sharing, learning, and adoption of proven construction project management methods across these sectors. Ultimately, this can lead to significant improvements in construction productivity as a whole. This research analyzed risks in different construction sectors, including the commercial building, industrial, and civil infrastructure sectors in a comparative and quantitative manner. Project risk registers from the three construction sectors were analyzed using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis and coincidence analysis. The study identified various risk configurations in each sector, as well as their similarities and dissimilarities. Based on the findings, an ideal path to the utilization and dissemination of advanced construction management strategies and methods across the construction sectors was developed. These results are expected to assist project participants and stakeholders in adopting and implementing advanced project planning, delivery, and management strategies derived from other construction sectors while taking into account different risks. The construction industry possesses a wealth of effective and proven construction project management knowledge and know-how that holds the potential to enhance productivity. Despite these resources, the industry still faces productivity challenges. One contributing factor is the industry’s isolated nature, which makes it difficult to share and disseminate knowledge and know-how across construction sectors and the industry as a whole. Identifying similarities and differences across the construction sectors is one prerequisite for promoting seamless knowledge sharing and dissemination. These factors influence the level of modifications and adjustments for successful implementation in different construction sectors. In this background, this study identified similarities and dissimilarities in project risk spectrums across construction sectors in a comparative manner. Ideal pathways for sharing and disseminating knowledge and know-how were proposed based on the observed risk spectrums. The findings aim to streamline the sharing and dissemination of construction management expertise by offering direction for evaluating and selecting appropriate project planning, delivery, and management strategies. Such insights, which take into account different project risk spectrums in different construction sectors, will contribute significantly to improving productivity throughout the construction industry.
publisherASCE
titleComparative Analysis of Project Risks across Construction Sectors
typeJournal Article
journal volume150
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13932
journal fristpage04024038-1
journal lastpage04024038-12
page12
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record