| description abstract | The rapid identification of structural damage in pavements remains a challenging issue. This paper proposes an automatic identification method that combines nondestructive testing, the ground penetrating radar (GPR), and object detection (OD) models for pavement structural assessment. Radar wave image data were collected from a 40 km single-lane track road and processed to create the training data set of 2,000 labeled images with two types of structural distress. Four OD models, including Faster R-CNN, YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and DETR, were adapted and trained on the data set to recognize structural damage in the images, and their prediction performances were compared. The results demonstrated that YOLOv8 was the state-of-the-art (SOTA) model, which achieved precise identification of the location and type of pavement structural damage with a mean average precision (mAP) of 98.5%. This study contributes to the improvement of latest OD models in the non-destructive inspection, facilitating the development of real-time automated pavement assessment and maintenance decision systems. This research addresses a common problem in civil engineering: how to quickly detect all hidden damage in pavement structures over long stretches of highway projects. Although there has been previous research in this area, finding a more reliable solution has proven to be a challenging goal. This study presents a method that utilizes the geological radar, a nondestructive testing technology, meaning it will not harm the road, along with artificial intelligence (AI) computer models to identify damage under the pavement surface. Think of it as teaching a computer to recognize cracks or looseness in the radar images of the road. Four different computer models were trained using 2,000 road images with known damage to teach them how to identify different damage features. The results were impressive—the computer could accurately identify the location and type of damage with a high level of confidence. In fact, the best model achieved a 98.5% score measured by mean average precision, which indicates its effectiveness. This research has significant practical applications as it streamlines the process of inspecting roads for structural problems, making it faster and more efficient. It can help with real-time evaluations and decisions about road maintenance. | |
