| description abstract | Staged construction is often used for bridges, in which a portion of a bridge remains open to traffic while another portion is closed for construction. Although staged construction reduces delays and the need for detours, subjecting the partially constructed bridge to dead and vehicular live loading can lead to damage and subsequent deterioration, including compromised longitudinal construction joints and transverse deck cracking. Despite past studies and best practices, transverse cracking persists and is often observed more on one side of the deck during construction, and no definitive explanation has been provided. As such, the objective of this study is to present a mechanics-based method for assessing transverse deck cracking in bridges during staged construction. Demonstrated on two bridges that underwent staged construction, the assessment method provides insights into the persistence of the issue and provides a mechanics-based explanation for observations of transverse cracking sometimes being observed only on one side of the bridge. The method, based on the superposition of strains, considers the sequence of steps in the construction process and estimates strain demands in the concrete decks at each stage, considering variations of the structural configuration, applied loads, and time-dependent behaviors. The results of the assessment agree with finite-element analysis results while requiring less model development and computational effort. The estimated strain history is then used to assess whether transverse cracking occurs by comparing the demand to the concrete’s tensile strength in time. The method is demonstrated on a new bridge constructed in stages and an existing bridge that underwent rehabilitation via staged construction. The results of the demonstrations suggest the importance of evaluating both the open and closed portions of bridge decks at each stage, as each portion has different structural and mechanical properties and loading demands. The assessment results are qualitatively validated based upon information from postconstruction bridge inspections. Furthermore, the method can be used to gain insight into mitigating transverse deck cracking and support decision-making for bridge construction practices. | |
