| description abstract | Streamflow forecasts play an important role in water resources operation and management, and skillful seasonal forecasts can significantly facilitate the decision-making process. Streamflow variability is often associated with various large-scale, slowly evolving climate phenomena (e.g., El Nino Southern Oscillation), promoting the value of climate indices for streamflow forecast development, and has been investigated extensively. Separately, global climate models (GCMs), which provide climate forecasts out to 12 months globally, have been demonstrated to enhance seasonal streamflow predictability. However, neither the combination nor the interaction of these two sources of predictability has been given much attention. In this work, we propose a framework that can simultaneously account for antecedent climate indices and GCM forecasts in statistical streamflow forecasts and address how their interactions affect predictability. More specifically, we build a streamflow forecast framework combining statistical forecast models conditioned on climate indices with dynamical North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) precipitation forecasts to generate streamflow forecast ensembles, and merge ensemble members with a Bayesian model averaging with bootstrap aggregating (BMA-bagging) approach. The framework is applied to streamflow on the Blue Nile River upstream of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD). Most NMME models tend to improve one-month-ahead GERD inflow forecasts; however, longer lead times prove challenging, and require specific NMME model selection. In contrast, although the value of climate indices varies with forecast lead time, their potential contribution grows at multimonth leads. The GERD inflow forecasts including NMME models and climate indices can simultaneously take advantage of both sources of predictability and prove superior across lead times as compared to including either source individually. | |
