Show simple item record

contributor authorCaren Marzban
contributor authorJueyi Liu
contributor authorPhilippe Tissot
date accessioned2023-04-12T18:52:06Z
date available2023-04-12T18:52:06Z
date copyright2022/11/30
date issued2022
identifier otherAIES-D-21-0004.1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4290381
description abstractResampling methods such as cross validation or bootstrap are often employed to estimate the uncertainty in a loss function due to sampling variability, usually for the purpose of model selection. In models that require nonlinear optimization, however, the existence of local minima in the loss function landscape introduces an additional source of variability that is confounded with sampling variability. In other words, some portion of the variability in the loss function across different resamples is due to local minima. Given that statistically sound model selection is based on an examination of variance, it is important to disentangle these two sources of variability. To that end, a methodology is developed for estimating each, specifically in the context of
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleOn Variability due to Local Minima and K-Fold Cross Validation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume1
journal issue4
journal titleArtificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems
identifier doi10.1175/AIES-D-21-0004.1
treeArtificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems:;2022:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record