Show simple item record

contributor authorWenyu Zhou
contributor authorL. Ruby Leung
contributor authorJian Lu
date accessioned2023-04-12T18:44:03Z
date available2023-04-12T18:44:03Z
date copyright2022/11/29
date issued2022
identifier otherJCLI-D-22-0336.1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4290146
description abstractTropical precipitation in climate models presents significant biases in both the large-scale pattern (i.e., double intertropical convergence zone bias) and local-scale characteristics (i.e., drizzling bias with too frequent drizzle/convection and reduced occurrences of no and heavy precipitation). By untangling the coupled system and analyzing the biases in precipitation, cloud, and radiation, this study shows that local-scale drizzling bias in atmospheric models can lead to large-scale double-ITCZ bias in coupled models by inducing convective-regime-dependent biases in precipitation and cloud radiative effects (CRE). The double-ITCZ bias consists of a hemispherically asymmetric component that arises from the asymmetric SST bias and a nearly symmetric component that exists in atmospheric models without the SST bias. By increasing light rain but reducing heavy rain, local-scale drizzling bias induces positive (negative) precipitation bias in the moderate (strong) convective regime, leading to the nearly symmetric wet bias in atmospheric models. By affecting the cloud profile, local-scale drizzling bias induces positive (negative) CRE bias in the stratocumulus (convective) regime in atmospheric models. Because the stratocumulus (convective) region is climatologically more pronounced in the southern (northern) tropics, the CRE bias is deemed to be hemispherically asymmetric and drives warm and wet (cold and dry) biases in the southern (northern) tropics when coupled to ocean. Our results suggest that correcting local-scale drizzling bias is critical for fixing large-scale double-ITCZ bias. The drizzling and double-ITCZ biases are not alleviated in models with mesoscale (0.25°–0.5°) or even storm-resolving (∼3 km) resolution, implying that either large-eddy simulation or fundamental improvement in small-scale subgrid parameterizations is needed.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleLinking Large-Scale Double-ITCZ Bias to Local-Scale Drizzling Bias in Climate Models
typeJournal Paper
journal volume35
journal issue24
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0336.1
journal fristpage4365
journal lastpage4379
page4365–4379
treeJournal of Climate:;2022:;volume( 035 ):;issue: 024
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record