Show simple item record

contributor authorChia-Hung Su
contributor authorS. A. O. Masoumi
contributor authorVahid Pirouzfar
contributor authorNguyen Van Nguyen
date accessioned2023-04-07T00:35:46Z
date available2023-04-07T00:35:46Z
date issued2022/11/01
identifier other%28ASCE%29PS.1949-1204.0000673.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289353
description abstractIn this study, the possibility of installing turboexpanders instead of throttle valves was investigated and analyzed using Aspen HYSYS and Aspen Capital Estimator version 12.1. The optimization and energy saving cases were studied for maximum power or electrical energy generation as well as liquefied natural gas (LNG) production. Three case studies with various refrigeration cycles were evaluated according to economic considerations. It was found that the cases of power generation and LNG production were the best cases for energy recovery in gas pressure–reduction stations. The capital cost and rate of return (ROR) of this process were $232.2 million and 75%, respectively. The employed technique and developed process can be used for the optimization of energy in gas pressure–reduction stations.
publisherASCE
titleInvestigation of Options for Harnessing Energy Losses at Pressure-Reducing Stations of High-Pressure Natural Gas Pipelines
typeJournal Article
journal volume13
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000673
journal fristpage04022038
journal lastpage04022038_7
page7
treeJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice:;2022:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record