Show simple item record

contributor authorMedya Fathi
contributor authorPramen P. Shrestha
date accessioned2022-12-27T20:48:23Z
date available2022-12-27T20:48:23Z
date issued2022/11/01
identifier other(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002391.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288020
description abstractWhile public-private partnership (PPP) is not an entirely new development in US procurement, the public and private sectors have adopted and applied it slowly, placing the United States behind the PPP global transportation market. Despite research efforts made in different aspects of the PPP delivery method, it is not yet clear whether the PPP delivery method can lead to better performance compared to the widely used design-build (DB) delivery method, particularly when applied to US highway projects. For this paper, the cost and schedule performance of 22 PPP and 122 DB highway projects were statistically compared to determine whether the performance of PPP highway projects was significantly better than DB highway projects. For comparison purposes, two scenarios were created based on the project’s completion date. The first included highway projects completed between 1995 and 2020 (22 PPPs and 122 DBs), and the second included all PPP projects and DB projects completed by 2007 (22 PPPs and 25 DBs). For the first scenario, the study shows that the mean construction intensity of PPP projects was significantly higher (about fivefold) than that of the DB projects ($1,300,000/day versus $267,000/day). This finding also applies to the second scenario; however, the difference was found to be reduced to threefold. In addition, the cost growth of PPP highway projects was significantly lower than DB highway projects in the second scenario (−0.04% versus 2.84%). Regarding schedule performance, no significant difference was found in either scenario. This study seeks to determine that the PPP delivery method fast tracks the design and construction of highway projects, as well as saves the overall project costs compared to the DB method. The main contribution of this study to the body of knowledge is that the PPP delivery method outperforms DB in terms of construction intensity and cost growth. This study will also assist US highway agencies and industry practitioners in better selecting an appropriate delivery method based on their key objectives and priorities for future projects.
publisherASCE
titlePublic–Private Partnership Project Performance Analysis Compared to Design-Build in Highway Projects
typeJournal Article
journal volume148
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002391
journal fristpage04022118
journal lastpage04022118_11
page11
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record