Show simple item record

contributor authorPawan Lingras
contributor authorMario Adamo
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:12:37Z
date available2017-05-08T21:12:37Z
date copyrightOctober 1996
date issued1996
identifier other%28asce%290887-3801%281996%2910%3A4%28300%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42874
description abstractImproving the quality of predictions from sample data is an important aspect of a data collection and analysis program. Regional and environmental agencies use different statistical modeling techniques for prediction. The advent of neural network technology has introduced a new set of prediction models. It is important to make sure that the modeling technique used provides the best possible accuracy. This study compared the existing approaches to the estimations of average and peak hourly traffic volumes with the multiple regression analysis and the neural network approach. All the approaches were compared using different classification schemes as well as different durations of traffic counts. The multiple regression analysis and the neural network approaches consistently performed better than the conventional approach. Apart from suggesting good modeling tools for estimating average and peak hour traffic volumes, the results also provide useful insight into the durations of short-term traffic counts and the classification schemes for highway sites.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAverage and Peak Traffic Volumes: Neural Nets, Regression, Factor Approaches
typeJournal Paper
journal volume10
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1996)10:4(300)
treeJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering:;1996:;Volume ( 010 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record