Show simple item record

contributor authorKent Davis
contributor authorW. B. Ledbetter
contributor authorJames L. Burati, Jr.
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:12:35Z
date available2017-05-08T21:12:35Z
date copyrightSeptember 1989
date issued1989
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281989%29115%3A3%28385%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42842
description abstractSeveral troublesome challenges face the U.S. construction industry: productivity is down, litigation is up, delays are common and expensive, foreign firms are taking a greater share of the market. The reasons are complex, but one important common factor is quality—or rather, the lack of it. In view of these facts, a quality performance tracking system (QPTS) has been developed to provide for the quantitative analysis of certain quality‐related aspects of projects, by systematically collecting and classifying costs of quality. By defining quality as “conformance to requirements,” the cost of quality becomes measurable. It consists of two main parts, the cost of quality management efforts and the cost of correcting deviations. A total of 15 categories identify the main quality management efforts. When coupled with 24 deviation categories (plus six “repeat” quality management categories), most of the important quality costs can be identified for tracking and analysis. These categories can be easily changed and adapted to meet individual company requirements for design, construction, and start‐up.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMeasuring Design and Construction Quality Costs
typeJournal Paper
journal volume115
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1989)115:3(385)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record