Show simple item record

contributor authorDavid A. Chin
date accessioned2022-05-07T21:28:44Z
date available2022-05-07T21:28:44Z
date issued2021-12-08
identifier other(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001649.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283778
description abstractThe curve-number method is reviewed and assessed using rainfall and runoff measurements at 80 well-instrumented experimental watersheds in the United States. Key results of the study show that the applicable curve number (CN) in design applications is not always independent of the rainfall amount, the uncertainty factors associated with CN can vary between watersheds, CN dependence on both rainfall duration and rainfall amount is detected for some catchments, and the characteristic infiltration rate of a catchment can be expressed as a function of CN. When the curve-number equation is used in estimating the runoff hydrograph, it is shown that implicit infiltration rates can sometimes exceed the realistic infiltration capacity of the catchment, and that not representing CN as a function of the rainfall amount can lead to substantial underestimation of the peak-runoff rate.
publisherASCE
titleEssential Considerations in Applying the Curve-Number Method
typeJournal Paper
journal volume148
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001649
journal fristpage04021071
journal lastpage04021071-12
page12
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record