Show simple item record

contributor authorAdrienne G. Donaghue
contributor authorSarah Beganskas
contributor authorErica R. McKenzie
date accessioned2022-05-07T20:44:10Z
date available2022-05-07T20:44:10Z
date issued2021-12-07
identifier otherJSWBAY.0000974.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282822
description abstractBioretention design can include a saturated internal water storage (IWS) layer to promote denitrification. Typical practice connects an underdrain, at the IWS base, to an upturned elbow; alternatively, the underdrain can be located at the top of the IWS. We coupled laboratory column studies and transport modeling to evaluate hydraulic efficiency, ev (tracer residence time/theoretical residence time), as a function of underdrain height and IWS width to depth (w/d) ratio. Tracer tests revealed ev decreased from 1.0 to 0.76 as underdrain height increased from 0 to 30 cm due to the presence of immobile zones below raised underdrains. For IWS w/d ratios greater than 1, ev was less sensitive to underdrain location and ranged 0.89 to 0.96. For raised underdrains, higher hydraulic loading rate (HLR) reduced IWS immobile zone size (22%) and enhanced exchange between old and new water. Site-specific features (i.e., IWS geometry and HLR) influence optimal IWS underdrain design and transport modeling provides more accurate predictions of mean residence time compared to theoretical calculations.
publisherASCE
titleInverted versus Raised: The Impact of Bioretention Underdrain Height on Internal Water-Storage Hydraulics
typeJournal Paper
journal volume8
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
identifier doi10.1061/JSWBAY.0000974
journal fristpage04021024
journal lastpage04021024-12
page12
treeJournal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment:;2021:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record