| contributor author | E. William East | |
| contributor author | Tim Roessler | |
| contributor author | Mark Lustig | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:12:33Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:12:33Z | |
| date copyright | October 1995 | |
| date issued | 1995 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290887-3801%281995%299%3A4%28229%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42823 | |
| description abstract | Organizations using architect/engineer (A/E) services typically require reviews of partially completed designs prior to submission of the final design. Many A/E firms also conduct internal quality-control reviews. The objective of these reviews is to increase the cost-effectiveness, timeliness, and overall quality of the completed construction project. Including all project stakeholders in these design reviews is crucial. This paper reports the results of an analysis of the design-review process and the development of a tool to assist design reviewers. The tool, called the Reviewer's Assistant, assists reviewers by capturing, storing, and retrieving design-review comments, and compiling lessons learned. The storage of comments and compilation of lessons learned enable future reviewers to benefit from the experience gained on past reviews of similar projects. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Improving the Design-Review Process: The Reviewer's Assistant | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 9 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1995)9:4(229) | |
| tree | Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering:;1995:;Volume ( 009 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
