Show simple item record

contributor authorNikolay Lalkovski
contributor authorUwe Starossek
date accessioned2022-05-07T20:24:07Z
date available2022-05-07T20:24:07Z
date issued2021-11-30
identifier other(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003244.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282380
description abstractIt is generally taken as a given that there is no reasonable design concept that could have prevented the collapse of the Twin Towers, once it was initiated, from progressing all the way down to the ground. This view is rooted in the idea that the force generated during the inevitable impact between what may be called the intact upper section (IUS) and the intact lower section (ILS)—meaning the building sections above and below the initially lost columns, respectively—will exceed by at least one order of magnitude the capacity of the latter. On closer inspection, this turns out to be only partially correct—it is correct with regard to the topmost floor plate of the ILS but not with regard to the columns below this floor plate. This paper shows that if the ILS in the Twin Towers had been topped by a stronger-than-ordinary floor plate allowing the columns below to respond properly, rather than be bypassed, these columns—and with them the ILS—would likely have survived. The paper subsequently proposes a building design concept consisting in the insertion of strengthened floor plates in intervals of 10–20 stories.
publisherASCE
titleThe Total Collapse of the Twin Towers: What It Would Have Taken to Prevent It Once Collapse Was Initiated
typeJournal Paper
journal volume148
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003244
journal fristpage04021276
journal lastpage04021276-12
page12
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record