Show simple item record

contributor authorJae‐Jun Kim
contributor authorC. William Ibbs
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:12:25Z
date available2017-05-08T21:12:25Z
date copyrightJuly 1992
date issued1992
identifier other%28asce%290887-3801%281992%296%3A3%28348%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42729
description abstractThis paper examines the object‐oriented data base as an alternative to the traditional, “pure” relational data base for construction project control information. An entity‐relationship (E‐R) model is developed to describe the piping work density identification process that is necessary for piping work package generation. With the E‐R model, a relational data base is developed to describe the characteristics of the relational data modeling concept. Then, an object‐oreinted data base (OODB) is developed with the same data and E‐R model to discuss specific features. Later, these two data bases are compared, with a focus on semantic expressiveness. Lessons are drawn from this comparison to illustrate the advantages, disadvantages, and appropriate uses of the OODB approach. The concluding discussion highlights the important distinctions and issues between these two data bases for users. The benefits of this examination are a better understanding of the potential of OODB approach.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComparing Object‐Oriented and Relational Data Models for Project Control
typeJournal Paper
journal volume6
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1992)6:3(348)
treeJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering:;1992:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record