Show simple item record

contributor authorMiguel Lopes
contributor authorSara Santos Cruz
contributor authorPaulo Pinho
date accessioned2022-01-30T21:12:16Z
date available2022-01-30T21:12:16Z
date issued12/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
identifier other%28ASCE%29UP.1943-5444.0000608.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267813
description abstractPublic spaces, one of the key elements of the urban structure, have always accompanied major urban changes, with different levels of success. Recently, new forms of space provision and management have emerged, disrupting spatial structures; redefining social values, needs, and routines; and changing the way traditional public spaces are perceived. Although the last decades brought an extensive study and debate regarding the particularities of public spaces, different disciplines and points of view are rarely combined, justifying the need for a new tool. This paper describes the application of the publicness evaluation model (PEM) to eight case studies in Oporto, Portugal, and Newcastle upon Tyne, England. With the use of four interconnected areas of analysis, this framework attempts to include the particularities of the involvement of different stakeholders in the production of contemporary public space, as well as their concerns and expectations regarding each space, through the creation of a composite publicness score.
publisherASCE
titlePublicness of Contemporary Urban Spaces: Comparative Study Between Porto and Newcastle
typeJournal Paper
journal volume146
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000608
page13
treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record