Show simple item record

contributor authorPrabhata K. Swamee
contributor authorAshok K. Sharma
date accessioned2022-01-30T21:00:00Z
date available2022-01-30T21:00:00Z
date issued2/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
identifier other%28ASCE%29PS.1949-1204.0000436.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267479
description abstractA water supply gravity main does not require power input; thus, it is preferred in comparison to a water supply pumping main. Moreover, a gravity main has greater reliability because it does not have moving parts, e.g., pumps and motors, and is independent of power requirement. Availability of a regular power supply at a required current and voltage is a problem in many parts of the globe. For a gently sloping topography, the gravity main involves large pipe diameters. Thus, in comparison with a pumping main, a gravity main may be uneconomical due to large size and associated overall cost. A review of the literature indicated that there is no guideline available for the adoption of a gravity main for a gently sloping terrain. In this investigation, a criterion has been obtained to ascertain if a gravity main or pumping main will be economic for a given gentle terrain for pipe laying.
publisherASCE
titleEconomic Viability of Water-Supply Gravity Main
typeJournal Paper
journal volume11
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000436
page3
treeJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice:;2020:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record