Show simple item record

contributor authorElsa Gisquet
date accessioned2022-01-30T20:59:21Z
date available2022-01-30T20:59:21Z
date issued11/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
identifier other%28ASCE%29NH.1527-6996.0000406.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267464
description abstractThis case study identifies human factors that ought to be considered when studying industrial accident conditions, focusing on lessons learned from government involvement in the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear accident, which occurred on March 11, 2011, in Japan. Chronological accounts of the accident have focused on the government’s emergency response, using official reports and published testimonies. This multilevel analysis examines how the high degree of centralization and isolation among crisis management actors created obstacles that left them unable them to build narrative bridges among themselves. It will argue that in the aftermath of the accident, the successive explosion of three narrative bridges—structural, interactional, and contextual—prevented them from reacting more effectively to the disaster.
publisherASCE
titleImpossibility of Narrative Bridges across Boundaries: Case Study of Fukushima-Daiichi Accident
typeJournal Paper
journal volume21
journal issue4
journal titleNatural Hazards Review
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000406
page10
treeNatural Hazards Review:;2020:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record