Show simple item record

contributor authorArash Hassanikhah
contributor authorEric C. Drumm
date accessioned2022-01-30T19:38:10Z
date available2022-01-30T19:38:10Z
date issued2020
identifier other%28ASCE%29GM.1943-5622.0001662.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265690
description abstractNatural slopes are often observed to have a concave, convex, or a combination concave/convex profile, yet constructed slopes are traditionally designed with planar cross-sectional geometry. In this paper, the stability of two planar slopes was compared with that of companion concave slopes, designed to have similar factor of safety (FOS) under gravity loading. The stability of these slopes was then investigated in response to a suction event followed by a precipitation event, and it was shown that both the planar and the concave slopes experienced similar changes in stability. Additional analyses were conducted with a simulated erosion mechanism to investigate how the planar and concave shapes would evolve under a sequence of three similar suction/precipitation/erosion cycles. The results suggest that for these slopes, the second and third simulated weather cycles reduced the stability of the slopes, yet had a lesser effect on the concave slopes than the planar slopes. This is in spite of the fact that the planar slopes became more concave-like due to the simulated erosion and suggests that slopes designed to be concave may perform better than the planar slopes.
publisherASCE
titleStability and Evolution of Planar and Concave Slopes under Unsaturated and Rainfall Conditions
typeJournal Paper
journal volume20
journal issue7
journal titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001662
page04020099
treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2020:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record