Show simple item record

contributor authorAhsen Maqsoom
contributor authorSaifullah Jan Wazir
contributor authorRafiq M. Choudhry
contributor authorMuhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem
contributor authorHafiz Zahoor
date accessioned2022-01-30T19:20:48Z
date available2022-01-30T19:20:48Z
date issued2020
identifier other%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001740.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265117
description abstractThe relationship between the perceived fairness of administering projects’ claims and contractors’ reduced potential to disputes is probably missing in published literature in the context of engineering ethics. In the current research, the moderating effect of engineering ethics is explored in relationship between perceived fairness and contractors’ reduced potential to dispute. The data are gathered from 90 contract administrators in the construction industry of Pakistan. The results depict that decision outcome fairness, procedural fairness, quality of treatment experienced, and control indicate a significantly positive effect on the contractors’ reduced potential to disputes. Additionally, engineering ethics positively moderated the relationship between the quality of treatment experienced and contractors’ reduced potential to disputes. These results can guide project management teams to diminish the contractors’ perceptions concerning construction claims and disputes.
publisherASCE
titleInfluence of Perceived Fairness on Contractors’ Potential to Dispute: Moderating Effect of Engineering Ethics
typeJournal Paper
journal volume146
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001740
page04019090
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record