| contributor author | Jaramillo, A. | |
| contributor author | Mesa, O. J. | |
| contributor author | Raymond, D. J. | |
| date accessioned | 2019-10-05T06:52:18Z | |
| date available | 2019-10-05T06:52:18Z | |
| date copyright | 7/1/2019 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2019 | |
| identifier other | JAS-D-19-0025.1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263691 | |
| description abstract | AbstractWe respond here to Makarieva et al.?s critique of Jaramillo et al., who showed that the concept of condensation-induced atmospheric dynamics (CIAD) violates Newton?s third law. We confirm here that their analysis is valid and that there is a contradiction in Makarieva et al.?s arguments. We also solve the paradox that CIAD can produce results consistent with observations despite being a flawed theory. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Reply to “Comments on ‘Is Condensation-Induced Atmospheric Dynamics a New Theory of the Origin of the Winds?’” | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 76 | |
| journal issue | 7 | |
| journal title | Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/JAS-D-19-0025.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 2187 | |
| journal lastpage | 2191 | |
| tree | Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2019:;volume 076:;issue 007 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
