Show simple item record

contributor authorGuan, Hong
contributor authorZhu, Yuejian
contributor authorSinsky, Eric
contributor authorLi, Wei
contributor authorZhou, Xiaqiong
contributor authorHou, Dingchen
contributor authorMelhauser, Christopher
contributor authorWobus, Richard
date accessioned2019-10-05T06:44:28Z
date available2019-10-05T06:44:28Z
date copyright12/5/2018 12:00:00 AM
date issued2018
identifier otherWAF-D-18-0100.1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263275
description abstractAbstractThe National Centers for Environmental Prediction have generated an 18-yr (1999?2016) subseasonal (weeks 3 and 4) reforecast to support the Climate Prediction Center?s operational mission. To create this reforecast, the subseasonal experiment version of the GEFS was run every Wednesday, initialized at 0000 UTC with 11 members. The Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) served as the initial analyses for 1999?2010 and 2011?16, respectively. The analysis of 2-m temperature error demonstrates that the model has a strong warm bias over the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and North America (NA) during the warm season. During the boreal winter, the 2-m temperature errors over NA exhibit large interannual and intraseasonal variability. For NA and the NH, weeks 3 and 4 errors are mostly saturated, with initial conditions having a negligible impact. Week 2 errors (day 11) are ~88.6% and 86.6% of their saturated levels, respectively. The 1999?2015 reforecast biases were used to calibrate the 2-m temperature forecasts in 2016, which reduces (increases) the systematic error (forecast skill) for NA, the NH, the Southern Hemisphere, and the tropics, with a maximum benefit for NA during the warm season. Overall, analysis adjustment for the CFSR period makes bias characteristics more consistent with the GDAS period over the NH and tropics and substantially improves the corresponding forecast skill levels. The calibration of the forecast using week 2 bias provides similar skill to using weeks 3 and 4 bias, promising the feasibility of using week 2 bias to calibrate the weeks 3 and 4 forecast. Our results also demonstrate that 10-yr reforecasts are an optimal training period. This is particularly beneficial considering limited computing resources.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleSystematic Error Analysis and Calibration of 2-m Temperature for the NCEP GEFS Reforecast of the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Project
typeJournal Paper
journal volume34
journal issue2
journal titleWeather and Forecasting
identifier doi10.1175/WAF-D-18-0100.1
journal fristpage361
journal lastpage376
treeWeather and Forecasting:;2018:;volume 034:;issue 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record