Show simple item record

contributor authorFunk, Chris
contributor authorPeterson, Pete
contributor authorPeterson, Seth
contributor authorShukla, Shraddhanand
contributor authorDavenport, Frank
contributor authorMichaelsen, Joel
contributor authorKnapp, Kenneth R.
contributor authorLandsfeld, Martin
contributor authorHusak, Gregory
contributor authorHarrison, Laura
contributor authorRowland, James
contributor authorBudde, Michael
contributor authorMeiburg, Alex
contributor authorDinku, Tufa
contributor authorPedreros, Diego
contributor authorMata
date accessioned2019-10-05T06:43:02Z
date available2019-10-05T06:43:02Z
date copyright6/19/2019 12:00:00 AM
date issued2019
identifier otherJCLI-D-18-0698.1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263197
description abstractAbstractUnderstanding the dynamics and physics of climate extremes will be a critical challenge for twenty-first-century climate science. Increasing temperatures and saturation vapor pressures may exacerbate heat waves, droughts, and precipitation extremes. Yet our ability to monitor temperature variations is limited and declining. Between 1983 and 2016, the number of observations in the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU) Tmax product declined precipitously (5900 ? 1000); 1000 poorly distributed measurements are insufficient to resolve regional Tmax variations. Here, we show that combining long (1983 to the near present), high-resolution (0.05°), cloud-screened archives of geostationary satellite thermal infrared (TIR) observations with a dense set of ~15 000 station observations explains 23%, 40%, 30%, 41%, and 1% more variance than the CRU globally and for South America, Africa, India, and areas north of 50°N, respectively; even greater levels of improvement are shown for the 2011?16 period (28%, 45%, 39%, 52%, and 28%, respectively). Described here for the first time, the TIR Tmax algorithm uses subdaily TIR distributions to screen out cloud-contaminated observations, providing accurate (correlation ≈0.8) gridded emission Tmax estimates. Blending these gridded fields with ~15 000 station observations provides a seamless, high-resolution source of accurate Tmax estimates that performs well in areas lacking dense in situ observations and even better where in situ observations are available. Cross-validation results indicate that the satellite-only, station-only, and combined products all perform accurately (R ≈ 0.8?0.9, mean absolute errors ≈ 0.8?1.0). Hence, the Climate Hazards Center Infrared Temperature with Stations (CHIRTSmax) dataset should provide a valuable resource for climate change studies, climate extreme analyses, and early warning applications.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleA High-Resolution 1983–2016 Tmax Climate Data Record Based on Infrared Temperatures and Stations by the Climate Hazard Center
typeJournal Paper
journal volume32
journal issue17
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0698.1
journal fristpage5639
journal lastpage5658
treeJournal of Climate:;2019:;volume 032:;issue 017
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record