Show simple item record

contributor authorTaszarek, Mateusz
contributor authorAllen, John
contributor authorPúčik, Tomáš
contributor authorGroenemeijer, Pieter
contributor authorCzernecki, Bartosz
contributor authorKolendowicz, Leszek
contributor authorLagouvardos, Kostas
contributor authorKotroni, Vasiliki
contributor authorSchulz, Wolfgang
date accessioned2019-10-05T06:40:36Z
date available2019-10-05T06:40:36Z
date copyright12/18/2018 12:00:00 AM
date issued2018
identifier otherJCLI-D-18-0372.1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263070
description abstractAbstractThe climatology of (severe) thunderstorm days is investigated on a pan-European scale for the period of 1979?2017. For this purpose, sounding measurements, surface observations, lightning data from ZEUS (a European-wide lightning detection system) and European Cooperation for Lightning Detection (EUCLID), ERA-Interim, and severe weather reports are compared and their respective strengths and weaknesses are discussed. The research focuses on the annual cycles in thunderstorm activity and their spatial variability. According to all datasets thunderstorms are the most frequent in the central Mediterranean, the Alps, the Balkan Peninsula, and the Carpathians. Proxies for severe thunderstorm environments show similar patterns, but severe weather reports instead have their highest frequency over central Europe. Annual peak thunderstorm activity is in July and August over northern, eastern, and central Europe, contrasting with peaks in May and June over western and southeastern Europe. The Mediterranean, driven by the warm waters, has predominant activity in the fall (western part) and winter (eastern part) while the nearby Iberian Peninsula and eastern Turkey have peaks in April and May. Trend analysis of the mean annual number of days with thunderstorms since 1979 indicates an increase over the Alps and central, southeastern, and eastern Europe with a decrease over the southwest. Multiannual changes refer also to changes in the pattern of the annual cycle. Comparison of different data sources revealed that although lightning data provide the most objective sampling of thunderstorm activity, short operating periods and areas devoid of sensors limit their utility. In contrast, reanalysis complements these disadvantages to provide a longer climatology, but is prone to errors related to modeling thunderstorm occurrence and the numerical simulation itself.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleA Climatology of Thunderstorms across Europe from a Synthesis of Multiple Data Sources
typeJournal Paper
journal volume32
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0372.1
journal fristpage1813
journal lastpage1837
treeJournal of Climate:;2018:;volume 032:;issue 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record