Show simple item record

contributor authorHe, Sicheng
contributor authorYang, Jing
contributor authorBao, Qing
contributor authorWang, Lei
contributor authorWang, Bin
date accessioned2019-09-22T09:02:41Z
date available2019-09-22T09:02:41Z
date copyright10/18/2018 12:00:00 AM
date issued2018
identifier otherJCLI-D-18-0104.1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4262447
description abstractRealistic reproduction of historical extreme precipitation has been challenging for both reanalysis and global climate model (GCM) simulations. This work assessed the fidelities of the combined gridded observational datasets, reanalysis datasets, and GCMs [CMIP5 and the Chinese Academy of Sciences Flexible Global Ocean?Atmospheric Land System Model?Finite-Volume Atmospheric Model, version 2 (FGOALS-f2)] in representing extreme precipitation over East China. The assessment used 552 stations? rain gauge data as ground truth and focused on the probability distribution function of daily precipitation and spatial structure of extreme precipitation days. The TRMM observation displays similar rainfall intensity?frequency distributions as the stations. However, three combined gridded observational datasets, four reanalysis datasets, and most of the CMIP5 models cannot capture extreme precipitation exceeding 150 mm day?1, and all underestimate extreme precipitation frequency. The observed spatial distribution of extreme precipitation exhibits two maximum centers, located over the lower-middle reach of Yangtze River basin and the deep South China region, respectively. Combined gridded observations and JRA-55 capture these two centers, but ERA-Interim, MERRA, and CFSR and almost all CMIP5 models fail to capture them. The percentage of extreme rainfall in the total rainfall amount is generally underestimated by 25%?75% in all CMIP5 models. Higher-resolution models tend to have better performance, and physical parameterization may be crucial for simulating correct extreme precipitation. The performances are significantly improved in the newly released FGOALS-f2 as a result of increased resolution and a more realistic simulation of moisture and heating profiles. This work pinpoints the common biases in the combined gridded observational datasets and reanalysis datasets and helps to improve models? simulation of extreme precipitation, which is critically important for reliable projection of future changes in extreme precipitation.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleFidelity of the Observational/Reanalysis Datasets and Global Climate Models in Representation of Extreme Precipitation in East China
typeJournal Paper
journal volume32
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0104.1
journal fristpage195
journal lastpage212
treeJournal of Climate:;2018:;volume 032:;issue 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record