Show simple item record

contributor authorLiu, L.
contributor authorShawki, D.
contributor authorVoulgarakis, A.
contributor authorKasoar, M.
contributor authorSamset, B. H.
contributor authorMyhre, G.
contributor authorForster, P. M.
contributor authorHodnebrog, Ø.
contributor authorSillmann, J.
contributor authorAalbergsjø, S. G.
contributor authorBoucher, O.
contributor authorFaluvegi, G.
contributor authorIversen, T.
contributor authorKirkevåg, A.
contributor authorLamarque, J.-F.
contributor authorOlivié, D.
contributor authorRichardson, T.
contributor authorShindell, D.
contributor authorTakemura, T.
date accessioned2019-09-19T10:09:22Z
date available2019-09-19T10:09:22Z
date copyright3/6/2018 12:00:00 AM
date issued2018
identifier otherjcli-d-17-0439.1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4262168
description abstractAbstractAtmospheric aerosols such as sulfate and black carbon (BC) generate inhomogeneous radiative forcing and can affect precipitation in distinct ways compared to greenhouse gases (GHGs). Their regional effects on the atmospheric energy budget and circulation can be important for understanding and predicting global and regional precipitation changes, which act on top of the background GHG-induced hydrological changes. Under the framework of the Precipitation Driver Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP), multiple models were used for the first time to simulate the influence of regional (Asian and European) sulfate and BC forcing on global and regional precipitation. The results show that, as in the case of global aerosol forcing, the global fast precipitation response to regional aerosol forcing scales with global atmospheric absorption, and the slow precipitation response scales with global surface temperature response. Asian sulfate aerosols appear to be a stronger driver of global temperature and precipitation change compared to European aerosols, but when the responses are normalized by unit radiative forcing or by aerosol burden change, the picture reverses, with European aerosols being more efficient in driving global change. The global apparent hydrological sensitivities of these regional forcing experiments are again consistent with those for corresponding global aerosol forcings found in the literature. However, the regional responses and regional apparent hydrological sensitivities do not align with the corresponding global values. Through a holistic approach involving analysis of the energy budget combined with exploring changes in atmospheric dynamics, we provide a framework for explaining the global and regional precipitation responses to regional aerosol forcing.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleA PDRMIP Multimodel Study on the Impacts of Regional Aerosol Forcings on Global and Regional Precipitation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume31
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0439.1
journal fristpage4429
journal lastpage4447
treeJournal of Climate:;2018:;volume 031:;issue 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record