Show simple item record

contributor authorKeul, Alexander G.
contributor authorBrunner, Bernhard
contributor authorAllen, John
contributor authorWilson, Katie A.
contributor authorTaszarek, Mateusz
contributor authorPrice, Colin
contributor authorSoleiman, Gary
contributor authorSharma, Sanjay
contributor authorRoy, Partha
contributor authorAini, Mat Said
contributor authorElistina, Abu Bakar
contributor authorAbidin Ab Kadir, Mohd Zainal
contributor authorGomes, Chandima
date accessioned2019-09-19T10:05:39Z
date available2019-09-19T10:05:39Z
date copyright3/19/2018 12:00:00 AM
date issued2018
identifier otherwcas-d-16-0064.1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261447
description abstractABSTRACTWeather risk perception research lacks multihazard and transcultural datasets. This hypothesis-generating study used a cognitive behavioral approach and Brunswik?s lens model for subjective risk parameters across eight countries. In Germany, Poland, Israel, the United States, Brazil, India, Malaysia, and Australia, 812 field interviews took place with a uniform set of 37 questions about weather interest, media access, elementary meteorological knowledge, weather fear, preparedness, loss due to weather, and sociodemography. The local randomized quota samples were strictly tested for sample errors; however, they cannot be considered representative for individual countries due to sample size and methodology. Highly rated subjective risks included flood, heat, tornado, and lightning. Weather fear was most prominent in the Malaysian sample and lowest in the German.Subjective elements were further explored with bivariate correlations and a multivariate regression analysis. Sociodemography correlated with psychological variables like knowledge, interest, and fear. Fear was related with subjective risk; less educated and informed people were more fearful. A linear regression analysis identified interest, gender, housing type, education, loss due to weather, and local weather access as the significant predictors for preparedness. The level of preparedness was highest in the United States and Australia and lowest in the Malaysian and Brazilian samples. A lack of meteorological training and infrequent loss experiences make media communication important and emphasize the value of repetition for basic information. Elements of this survey can serve to monitor weather-related psychological orientations of vulnerable population groups. Finally, this survey provides a template with which larger representative transcultural multihazard perception studies can be pursued.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleMultihazard Weather Risk Perception and Preparedness in Eight Countries
typeJournal Paper
journal volume10
journal issue3
journal titleWeather, Climate, and Society
identifier doi10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0064.1
journal fristpage501
journal lastpage520
treeWeather, Climate, and Society:;2018:;volume 010:;issue 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record