Show simple item record

contributor authorManijeh Mahmoudzadeh Varzi
contributor authorNeil Grigg
date accessioned2019-09-18T10:42:45Z
date available2019-09-18T10:42:45Z
date issued2019
identifier other%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001401.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260590
description abstractTransfers of the right to use water can provide flexibility in regions where cities and farms compete for supplies. For example, the state of Colorado’s prior appropriation water law allows purchase and transfer of water among water users. During the last half century many cities have used this mechanism to buy water from agricultural water holders to satisfy their growing water demands. However, the transfer of water from rural to urban areas has left agricultural lands fallow and had negative effects on the economies and societies of rural communities. Colorado’s Water Plan addresses this problem by seeking alternative methods of transferring water so that the ownership of water rights stays in the agricultural sector but water saved on farms can be shared with urban areas. This paper reviews the alternative methods suggested in Colorado’s Water Plan, determines their capacities and shortcomings, and summarizes the efforts in the state to implement these methods. Lessons learned have important implications for improving the efficiency of water allocation in other dry regions.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAlternative Water Transfer Methods: Review of Colorado Experiences
typeJournal Paper
journal volume145
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001401
page04019011
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 145 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record