Show simple item record

contributor authorShih-Chieh Kao; Scott T. DeNeale; David B. Watson
date accessioned2019-03-10T12:12:19Z
date available2019-03-10T12:12:19Z
date issued2019
identifier other%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001768.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4255089
description abstractProbable maximum precipitation (PMP) is the primary criterion used to design flood protection measures for critical infrastructures such as dams and nuclear power plants. Based on our analysis using the Stage IV (ST4) quantitative precipitation estimates, precipitation associated with Hurricane Harvey near Houston, Texas, represents a PMP-scale storm and partially exceeds the Hydrometeorological Report No. 51 (HMR51) 72-h PMP estimates at 5,000  mi2 (ST4=805  mm; HMR51=780  mm) and 10,000  mi2 (ST4=686  mm; HMR51=673  mm). We also find statistically significant increasing trends since 1949 in the annual maximum total precipitable water and dew point temperature observations along the US Gulf Coast region, suggesting that, if the trend continues, the theoretical upper bound of PMP could be even larger. Our analysis of Hurricane Harvey rainfall data demonstrates that an extremely large PMP-scale storm is physically possible and that PMP estimates should not be considered overly conservative. This case study highlights the need for improved PMP estimation methodologies to account for long-term trends and to ensure the safety of our critical infrastructures.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleHurricane Harvey Highlights: Need to Assess the Adequacy of Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimation Methods
typeJournal Paper
journal volume24
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001768
page05019005
treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record