Show simple item record

contributor authorKretzschmar, Jan;Salzmann, Marc;Mülmenstädt, Johannes;Boucher, Olivier;Quaas, Johannes
date accessioned2018-01-03T11:01:05Z
date available2018-01-03T11:01:05Z
date copyright6/16/2017 12:00:00 AM
date issued2017
identifier otherjcli-d-16-0668.1.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4246092
description abstractAbstractIn an influential and interesting study, Stevens (2015) suggested that the global and also Northern Hemispheric warming during the early industrial period implies that the effective radiative forcing by anthropogenic aerosols in the year 2000 compared to 1850 cannot be more negative than ?1.0 W m?2. Here results from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project are analyzed and it is shown that there is little relationship between and the warming trend in the early industrial period in comprehensive climate models. In particular, some models simulate a warming in the early industrial period despite a strong (very negative) . The reason for this difference in results is that the global-mean log-linear scaling of with anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions introduced and used by Stevens tends to produce a substantially larger aerosol forcing compared to climate models in the first half of the twentieth century, when SO2 emissions were concentrated over smaller regions. In turn, it shows smaller (less negative) in the recent period with comparatively more widespread SO2 emissions.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComment on “Rethinking the Lower Bound on Aerosol Radiative Forcing”
typeJournal Paper
journal volume30
journal issue16
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0668.1
journal fristpage6579
journal lastpage6584
treeJournal of Climate:;2017:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 016
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record