Show simple item record

contributor authorAntonio Bilotta
contributor authorFrancesca Ceroni
contributor authorJoaquim A. O. Barros
contributor authorInês Costa
contributor authorAniello Palmieri
contributor authorZsombor K. Szabó
contributor authorEmidio Nigro
contributor authorStijn Matthys
contributor authorGyörgy L. Balazs
contributor authorMarisa Pecce
date accessioned2017-12-30T13:04:12Z
date available2017-12-30T13:04:12Z
date issued2016
identifier other%28ASCE%29CC.1943-5614.0000579.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245296
description abstractDespite the extensive research on the debonding behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) strengthening systems, no standard methodology has been established on its experimental characterization. To assess the performance and reliability of small-scale testing on near-surface mounted (NSM) FRP strengthening systems, an experimental program was carried out on a series of nine NSM FRP strengthening systems (bars and strips), in the framework of an international round robin testing (RRT). Eleven laboratories and seven manufacturers and suppliers participated in this extensive international exercise, which regarded both NSM and EBR FRP strengthening systems. The experimental results are discussed and compared in this paper in order to investigate (1) the bond behavior of NSM strips and bars, (2) the influence of alternative single-bond or double-bond shear pulling setups adopted by the participating laboratories, and (3) the influence in concrete strength due to different constituent materials between countries in applying a prescribed mix. The results show no significant influence of the concrete strength on both failure modes and loads. On the other hand, axial stiffness and surface treatment of the FRP NSM systems strongly affect both the bond strength and the parameters identifying the bond laws. Differences of bond strength experimentally recorded for the same FRP NSM systems tested according to different setups range between 10 and 25%. Therefore, for standard bond test protocol, the single shear bond test setup is more reliable, due to its higher feasibility compared with the double shear test setup.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleBond of NSM FRP-Strengthened Concrete: Round Robin Test Initiative
typeJournal Paper
journal volume20
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Composites for Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000579
page04015026
treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2016:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record