Show simple item record

contributor authorDavid J. Edkins
contributor authorRolando P. Orense
contributor authorRichard S. Henry
contributor authorJason M. Ingham
date accessioned2017-12-30T12:59:42Z
date available2017-12-30T12:59:42Z
date issued2016
identifier other%28ASCE%29PS.1949-1204.0000213.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244293
description abstractThe 2010/2011 Canterbury (New Zealand) earthquakes caused significant damage to buried pipeline infrastructure. Observations of damaged pipes that were made during either repair or replacement were used to define representative examples of the damage to each of the commonly used pipe materials. The different pipe materials that were considered included steel reinforced concrete, polyvinyl chloride, high-density polyethylene, cast iron, asbestos cement, and vitrified clay. Photographs of damaged pipes at the time of repair were collected and analyzed to identify pipe failure modes. It was determined that different pipeline materials exhibited different failure mechanisms during the earthquakes and that each pipe material was found to have a distinct failure signature. In particular, polyvinyl chloride pipes behaved in an unexpected brittle way. The failure mechanisms of each type of pipe are described using engineering nomenclature, and the signature failure modes are categorized and tabulated to facilitate comparison between the differing pipe materials.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSignature Failure Modes of Pipelines Constructed of Different Materials When Subjected to Earthquakes
typeJournal Paper
journal volume7
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000213
page04015014
treeJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice:;2016:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record