Show simple item record

contributor authorHanlong Liu
contributor authorHang Zhou
contributor authorGangqiang Kong
date accessioned2017-12-30T12:53:55Z
date available2017-12-30T12:53:55Z
date issued2016
identifier other%28ASCE%29EM.1943-7889.0001084.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243093
description abstractIn this paper, an upper-bound solution for the FCEM is proposed to study the effect of the plastic behavior of soil on the interpretation of a flat dilatometer test. Kinematically admissible displacement fields for the FCEM are derived from Zhou’s elastic solutions for an incompressible material. These displacement fields are then used to obtain an upper-bound solution for a FCEM based on energy conservation principles that the sum of the plastic and elastic work of soil is equal to the flat cavity expansion work, with yield being defined using the Tresca yield criterion. The upper-bound solution is validated by comparing the calculated list-off pressure for the flat dilatometer test using both the proposed upper-bound solution to an elastic solution and a series of field test data. The results show that the proposed upper-bound solution is better than the elastic solution in interpreting the flat dilatometer test.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleUpper-Bound Solution for Flat Cavity Expansion Model
typeJournal Paper
journal volume142
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001084
page04016035
treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record