Show simple item record

contributor authorAmy Kim
contributor authorStuart Anderson
contributor authorJeff Haberl
date accessioned2017-12-16T09:23:08Z
date available2017-12-16T09:23:08Z
date issued2016
identifier other%28ASCE%29AE.1943-5568.0000191.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4242203
description abstractThe use of energy service performance contracts (ESPCs) has become a popular method for financing energy conservation upgrades. To date, the use of the stipulated savings approach, often expressed as tables and equations, has been a popular method for calculating energy savings in ESPCs. However, no studies to date have confirmed or denied the literature findings regarding the use and acceptance of this method in the current industry through a systematic investigation. Therefore, this research identified other practices by conducting an ethnographic study with subject-matter experts, by reviewing publicly available technical reference manuals, and by analyzing a typical utility assessment report from a recent ESPC. In particular, the methods for quantifying lighting and lighting control measures were explored in detail. The findings indicate that the current industry relies on a stipulated savings method as a foundation for determining the baseline and postretrofit savings. In addition, the current industry relies on experienced engineers and their valuable tactical and institutional knowledge to build upon the stipulated equations and tailor them to individual projects.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCurrent Industry Methods for Quantifying Energy Service Projects: Key Findings and Lessons Learned
typeJournal Paper
journal volume22
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000191
treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 022 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record