Show simple item record

contributor authorQingbin Cui
contributor authorMehmet Emre Bayraktar
contributor authorMakarand Hastak
contributor authorIssam Minkarah
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:11:51Z
date available2017-05-08T21:11:51Z
date copyrightJuly 2004
date issued2004
identifier other%28asce%290742-597x%282004%2920%3A3%28118%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42402
description abstractSince the introduction of warranty provisions in federal highway jobs, more and more state departments of transportation (DOTs) have considered the use of such provisions to protect their initial investment. This paper describes the pros and cons of warranty contracting in highway construction based on a survey of warranty practices in the United States. In particular, the need for state DOTs to buy a warranty for a well-built project is questioned. As an alternative, this paper introduces the warranty option, which gives the DOT the right to buy a warranty only if it becomes necessary at the end of construction. This option is exercised if the performance on site warrants it. This paper describes the mechanics of the warranty option and its advantages over the conventional warranty. A bid evaluation model is also developed for the
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleUse of Warranties on Highway Projects: A Real Option Perspective
typeJournal Paper
journal volume20
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:3(118)
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record