Show simple item record

contributor authorMohamed Attalla
contributor authorTarek Hegazy
contributor authorEmad Elbeltagi
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:11:50Z
date available2017-05-08T21:11:50Z
date copyrightJanuary 2004
date issued2004
identifier other%28asce%290742-597x%282004%2920%3A1%2825%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42390
description abstractAs compared with new construction, reconstruction of operational facilities exhibits a higher challenge, particularly when multiple projects are involved. For owner organizations involved in such projects, use of in-house resources versus outside contractors has been a major dilemma, with each approach having its potential benefits. This paper uses a real-life case study approach to investigate the delivery of 800 small reconstruction projects using in-house forces. Details are described related to the prioritization, budgeting, organization structure, and the mechanisms used for staff allocation. It was found that the main characteristics of projects that are best delivered by in-house forces include high urgency and inadequate scope definition. Outsourcing this type of projects exposes the owner to a large number of changes and their consequent cost overruns/delays. Based on the case study, the challenges facing in-house delivered projects and the factors that contribute to their success were investigated and outlined. To verify the findings a questionnaire survey among similar organizations is conducted and its results discussed.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleIn-House Delivery of Multiple-Small Reconstruction Projects
typeJournal Paper
journal volume20
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:1(25)
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record