Evaluation of Valiantzas’ Simplified Forms of the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith Reference Evapotranspiration Model in a Humid ClimateSource: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 008Author:Koffi Djaman
,
Daran Rudnick
,
Valere C. Mel
,
Denis Mutiibwa
,
Lamine Diop
,
Mamadou Sall
,
Isa Kabenge
,
Ansoumana Bodian
,
Hossein Tabari
,
Suat Irmak
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001191Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The unavailability of some meteorological variables, especially solar radiation and wind speed, is the main constraint for reference evapotranspiration (ETo) estimation using the standard United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Penman–Monteith (FAO-PM) equation in most developing countries. The application of ETo methods with fewer input requirements is necessary under limited climatic data conditions. The FAO-PM method under limited data conditions and nine of Valiantzas’ equations were evaluated for daily ETo estimation in a humid climate in Uganda. The FAO-PM method with missing relative humidity data performed very well across Uganda, whereas using the long-term local wind speed average values in place of missing wind speed data resulted in inaccurate ETo estimates. Under missing solar radiation measurements, the FAO-PM method showed different performances relative to the locations. When more than one climatic variable is missing, the FAO-PM method yielded poor ETo estimates compared to the FAO-PM method with full climatic data. The performance of Valiantzas’ equations depends on data requirements: the more meteorological inputs, the higher the ETo accuracy.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Koffi Djaman | |
contributor author | Daran Rudnick | |
contributor author | Valere C. Mel | |
contributor author | Denis Mutiibwa | |
contributor author | Lamine Diop | |
contributor author | Mamadou Sall | |
contributor author | Isa Kabenge | |
contributor author | Ansoumana Bodian | |
contributor author | Hossein Tabari | |
contributor author | Suat Irmak | |
date accessioned | 2017-12-16T09:06:22Z | |
date available | 2017-12-16T09:06:22Z | |
date issued | 2017 | |
identifier other | %28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001191.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4238603 | |
description abstract | The unavailability of some meteorological variables, especially solar radiation and wind speed, is the main constraint for reference evapotranspiration (ETo) estimation using the standard United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Penman–Monteith (FAO-PM) equation in most developing countries. The application of ETo methods with fewer input requirements is necessary under limited climatic data conditions. The FAO-PM method under limited data conditions and nine of Valiantzas’ equations were evaluated for daily ETo estimation in a humid climate in Uganda. The FAO-PM method with missing relative humidity data performed very well across Uganda, whereas using the long-term local wind speed average values in place of missing wind speed data resulted in inaccurate ETo estimates. Under missing solar radiation measurements, the FAO-PM method showed different performances relative to the locations. When more than one climatic variable is missing, the FAO-PM method yielded poor ETo estimates compared to the FAO-PM method with full climatic data. The performance of Valiantzas’ equations depends on data requirements: the more meteorological inputs, the higher the ETo accuracy. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Evaluation of Valiantzas’ Simplified Forms of the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith Reference Evapotranspiration Model in a Humid Climate | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 143 | |
journal issue | 8 | |
journal title | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001191 | |
tree | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2017:;Volume ( 143 ):;issue: 008 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |