Show simple item record

contributor authorWilliam Ibbs
contributor authorMark Berry
contributor authorXiaodan Sun
date accessioned2017-12-16T09:05:24Z
date available2017-12-16T09:05:24Z
date issued2017
identifier other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000240.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4238355
description abstractSkipped and out-of-sequence work on construction projects is disruptive to work flow and damaging to labor productivity. It is a condition in which the originally planned, and probably most efficient and logical, work sequence is interrupted and changed. Change is a common reason for such circumstances. It may induce or force a contractor to skip work in an effort to progress the work and advance the schedule by continuing work efforts rather than demobilizing until the delay caused by the change is resolved. As a result, the contractor may need to rearrange work sequences to accommodate change or shorten the work schedule, and that may force workers to change means-and-methods or crew mix. That may in turn create productivity loss, increase project costs, reduce profits for contractors, and reduce project value for owners. To recover damages from decreased productivity resulting from out-of-sequence performance, a causal link must be demonstrated between disrupted performance and decreased productivity. Visualization of the disruption helps demonstrate the impact of skips and out-of-sequence work and establish that causal link. This paper presents a way the authors have used to visualize and analyze such out-of-sequence work. This paper is intended for owners, contractors, and other professionals who are interested in construction change and loss of productivity claims.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleVisualizing Skipped and Out-of-Sequence Work
typeJournal Paper
journal volume9
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000240
treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2017:;Volume ( 009 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record