Show simple item record

contributor authorEri Gavanski
contributor authorKurtis R. Gurley
contributor authorGregory A. Kopp
date accessioned2017-12-16T08:59:42Z
date available2017-12-16T08:59:42Z
date issued2016
identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0001556.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4237199
description abstractThe lack of a standard accepted method to estimate local peak pressure coefficients from wind tunnel data can lead to inconsistent definitions and interpretations, particularly because cost and time constraints associated with wind tunnel tests of low-rise buildings necessitate relatively short (equivalent full-scale) durations. This paper focuses on a Gumbel distribution fitting method widely used in practice. Because the sources of uncertainty regarding estimated peaks include the use of short-duration records (in practice) and the assumption that the observed peaks from wind tunnel pressure data are Gumbel-distributed, this is quantified in detail in terms of the parameters determining the required minimum record length. It is shown that 15 observed peaks can lead to local peak pressure estimates with adequate precision for many design scenarios. However, the conversion of peak coefficients from a short duration to those of a longer duration requires an increase in the number of observed peaks to maintain precision.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleUncertainties in the Estimation of Local Peak Pressures on Low-Rise Buildings by Using the Gumbel Distribution Fitting Approach
typeJournal Paper
journal volume142
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001556
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record