| contributor author | Charlock, T. | |
| contributor author | Herman, B. M. | |
| contributor author | Zdunkowski, W. G. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:38:53Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T17:38:53Z | |
| date copyright | 1976/12/01 | |
| date issued | 1976 | |
| identifier issn | 0021-8952 | |
| identifier other | ams-9196.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4232657 | |
| description abstract | Charlock and Herman (1976, hereafter CH) have criticized the formulation of the radiative flux equation of Zdunkowski et al. (ZBL), 1966. While Zdunkowski (Z) finds their paper very interesting, he does not agree with all of their arguments. Instead of writing a comment on their paper, which would precipitate a reply from CH without satisfactorily resolving the argument, we believe it is best to jointly write some comments. This will eliminate misunderstandings since all three authors are in agreement on the basic physics of the problem, but differ in the point of view of how best to apply the Elsasser scheme. In the following we will try to clarify our positions. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Comments on “Discussion of the Elsasser Formulation for Infrared Fluxes” | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 15 | |
| journal issue | 12 | |
| journal title | Journal of Applied Meteorology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0450(1976)015<1317:COOTEF>2.0.CO;2 | |
| journal fristpage | 1317 | |
| journal lastpage | 1319 | |
| tree | Journal of Applied Meteorology:;1976:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 012 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
