Show simple item record

contributor authorSiuta, David
contributor authorWest, Gregory
contributor authorStull, Roland
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:37:31Z
date available2017-06-09T17:37:31Z
date copyright2017/04/01
date issued2017
identifier issn0882-8156
identifier otherams-88278.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4232040
description abstracthis study evaluates the sensitivity of wind turbine hub-height wind speed forecasts to the planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme, grid length, and initial condition selection in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model over complex terrain. Eight PBL schemes available for the WRF-ARW dynamical core were tested with initial conditions sources from the North American Mesoscale (NAM) model and Global Forecast System (GFS) to produce short-term wind speed forecasts. The largest improvements in forecast accuracy primarily depended on the grid length or PBL scheme choice, although the most important factor varied by location, season, time of day, and bias-correction application. Aggregated over all locations, the Asymmetric Convective Model, version 2 (ACM2) PBL scheme provided the best forecast accuracy, particularly for the 12-km grid length. Other PBL schemes and grid lengths, however, did perform better than the ACM2 scheme for individual seasons or locations.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleWRF Hub-Height Wind Forecast Sensitivity to PBL Scheme, Grid Length, and Initial Condition Choice in Complex Terrain
typeJournal Paper
journal volume32
journal issue2
journal titleWeather and Forecasting
identifier doi10.1175/WAF-D-16-0120.1
journal fristpage493
journal lastpage509
treeWeather and Forecasting:;2017:;volume( 032 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record