Show simple item record

contributor authorElsner, James B.
contributor authorJagger, Thomas H.
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:35:07Z
date available2017-06-09T17:35:07Z
date copyright2006/04/01
date issued2006
identifier issn0882-8156
identifier otherams-87604.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231292
description abstractAdvances in hurricane climate science allow forecasts of seasonal landfall activity to be made. The authors begin with a review of the forecast methods available in the literature. They then reformulate the methods using a Bayesian probabilistic approach. This allows a direct comparison to be made while focusing on a single hindcast of the 2004 season over Florida. The models, including climatology, are estimated using Gibbs sampling. Diagnostic checks verify convergence and efficient mixing of the samples from each of the models. A below average sea level pressure gradient over the eastern North Atlantic Ocean during May and June in combination with an above average tropospheric-averaged wind index associated, in part, with a strengthening of the Bermuda high pressure during July resulted in an above average probability of at least one Florida hurricane. The relatively high hindcast probabilities for 2004 were in marked contrast to the most recent 50-yr empirical probabilities for Florida, but fell short in anticipating the unprecedented level of activity that ensued. Similar results are obtained from hindcasts of total U.S. hurricane activity for 2004.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComparison of Hindcasts Anticipating the 2004 Florida Hurricane Season
typeJournal Paper
journal volume21
journal issue2
journal titleWeather and Forecasting
identifier doi10.1175/WAF916.1
journal fristpage182
journal lastpage192
treeWeather and Forecasting:;2006:;volume( 021 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record