Show simple item record

contributor authorBurrows, William R.
contributor authorPrice, Colin
contributor authorWilson, Laurence J.
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:35:03Z
date available2017-06-09T17:35:03Z
date copyright2005/12/01
date issued2005
identifier issn0882-8156
identifier otherams-87580.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231264
description abstractStatistical models valid May?September were developed to predict the probability of lightning in 3-h intervals using observations from the North American Lightning Detection Network and predictors derived from Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model output at the Canadian Meteorological Centre. Models were built with pooled data from the years 2000?01 using tree-structured regression. Error reduction by most models was about 0.4?0.7 of initial predictand variance. Many predictors were required to model lightning occurrence for this large area. Highest ranked overall were the Showalter index, mean sea level pressure, and troposphere precipitable water. Three-hour changes of 500-hPa geopotential height, 500?1000-hPa thickness, and MSL pressure were highly ranked in most areas. The 3-h average of most predictors was more important than the mean or maximum (minimum where appropriate). Several predictors outranked CAPE, indicating it must appear with other predictors for successful statistical lightning prediction models. Results presented herein demonstrate that tree-structured regression is a viable method for building statistical models to forecast lightning probability. Real-time forecasts in 3-h intervals to 45?48 h were made in 2003 and 2004. The 2003 verification suggests a hybrid forecast based on a mixture of maximum and mean forecast probabilities in a radius around a grid point and on monthly climatology will improve accuracy. The 2004 verification shows that the hybrid forecasts had positive skill with respect to a reference forecast and performed better than forecasts defined by either the mean or maximum probability at most times. This was achieved even though an increase of resolution and change of convective parameterization scheme were made to the GEM model in May 2004.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleWarm Season Lightning Probability Prediction for Canada and the Northern United States
typeJournal Paper
journal volume20
journal issue6
journal titleWeather and Forecasting
identifier doi10.1175/WAF895.1
journal fristpage971
journal lastpage988
treeWeather and Forecasting:;2005:;volume( 020 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record