Show simple item record

contributor authorRoulston, Mark S.
contributor authorBolton, Gary E.
contributor authorKleit, Andrew N.
contributor authorSears-Collins, Addison L.
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:35:02Z
date available2017-06-09T17:35:02Z
date copyright2006/02/01
date issued2006
identifier issn0882-8156
identifier otherams-87572.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231256
description abstractModern operational methods of numerical weather prediction, such as ?ensemble forecasting,? allow assessments of state-dependent predictability to be made. This means that forecast-specific estimates of the forecast standard errors are possible. Quantitative estimates of forecast uncertainty are often not communicated to the public as it is unclear what the value of this information will be to people who must make weather-dependent decisions. Using laboratory-based methods developed by experimental economists to study individual choice it is found that nonspecialists are able to make better decisions that increase their expected reward while reducing their exposure to risk, when provided with information about the day-to-day uncertainty associated with temperature forecasts. The experimental framework used herein may provide a useful tool for evaluating the effectiveness with which weather forecasts can be communicated to end users.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleA Laboratory Study of the Benefits of Including Uncertainty Information in Weather Forecasts
typeJournal Paper
journal volume21
journal issue1
journal titleWeather and Forecasting
identifier doi10.1175/WAF887.1
journal fristpage116
journal lastpage122
treeWeather and Forecasting:;2006:;volume( 021 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record