Show simple item record

contributor authorBrown, Rodger A.
contributor authorFlickinger, Bradley A.
contributor authorForren, Eddie
contributor authorSchultz, David M.
contributor authorSirmans, Dale
contributor authorSpencer, Phillip L.
contributor authorWood, Vincent T.
contributor authorZiegler, Conrad L.
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:34:53Z
date available2017-06-09T17:34:53Z
date copyright2005/02/01
date issued2005
identifier issn0882-8156
identifier otherams-87517.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4231195
description abstractDoppler velocity and reflectivity measurements from Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) radars provide important input to forecasters as they prepare to issue short-term severe storm and tornado warnings. Current-resolution data collected by the radars have an azimuthal spacing of 1.0° and range spacing of 1.0 km for reflectivity and 0.25 km for Doppler velocity and spectrum width. To test the feasibility of improving data resolution, National Severe Storms Laboratory?s test bed WSR-88D (KOUN) collected data in severe thunderstorms using 0.5°-azimuthal spacing and 0.25-km-range spacing, resulting in eight times the resolution for reflectivity and twice the resolution for Doppler velocity and spectrum width. Displays of current-resolution WSR-88D Doppler velocity and reflectivity signatures in severe storms were compared with displays showing finer-resolution signatures. At all ranges, fine-resolution data provided better depiction of severe storm characteristics. Eighty-five percent of mean rotational velocities derived from fine-resolution mesocyclone signatures were stronger than velocities derived from current-resolution signatures. Likewise, about 85% of Doppler velocity differences across tornado and tornadic vortex signatures were stronger than values derived from current-resolution data. In addition, low-altitude boundaries were more readily detected using fine-resolution reflectivity data. At ranges greater than 100 km, fine-resolution reflectivity displays revealed severe storm signatures, such as bounded weak echo regions and hook echoes, which were not readily apparent on current-resolution displays. Thus, the primary advantage of fine-resolution measurements over current-resolution measurements is the ability to detect stronger reflectivity and Doppler velocity signatures at greater ranges from a WSR-88D.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleImproved Detection of Severe Storms Using Experimental Fine-Resolution WSR-88D Measurements
typeJournal Paper
journal volume20
journal issue1
journal titleWeather and Forecasting
identifier doi10.1175/WAF-832.1
journal fristpage3
journal lastpage14
treeWeather and Forecasting:;2005:;volume( 020 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record