| description abstract | ncreasing computational power has enabled grid resolutions that support large-eddy simulation (LES) of the atmospheric boundary layer. These simulations often use grid nesting or adaptive mesh refinement to refine the grid in regions of interest. LES generates errors at grid refinement interfaces, such as resolved energy accumulation, that may compromise solution accuracy. In this paper, the authors test the ability of two LES formulations and turbulence closures to mitigate errors associated with the use of LES on nonuniform grids for a half-channel approximation to a neutral atmospheric boundary layer simulation. Idealized simulations are used to examine flow across coarse?fine and fine?coarse interfaces, as would occur in a two-way nested configuration or with block structured adaptive mesh refinement. Specifically, explicit filtering of the advection term and the mixed model are compared to a standard LES formulation with an eddy viscosity model. Errors due to grid interfaces are evaluated by comparison to uniform grid solutions. It is found that explicitly filtering the advection term provides significant benefits, in that it allows both mass and momentum to be conserved across grid refinement interfaces. The mixed model reduces unphysical perturbations generated by wave reflection at the interfaces. These results suggest that the choice of LES formulation and turbulence closure can be used to help control grid refinement interface errors in atmospheric boundary layer simulations. | |
