| description abstract | he majority of international climate modeling centers now produce seasonal rainfall forecasts from coupled general circulation models (GCMs). Seasonal rainfall forecasting is highly challenging, and GCM forecast accuracy is still poor for many regions and seasons. Additionally, forecast uncertainty tends to be underestimated meaning that forecast probabilities are statistically unreliable. A common strategy employed to improve the overall accuracy and reliability of GCM forecasts is to merge forecasts from multiple models into a multimodel ensemble (MME). The most widely used technique is to simply pool all of the forecast ensemble members from multiple GCMs into what is known as a superensemble. In Australia, seasonal rainfall forecasts are produced using the Predictive Ocean?Atmosphere Model for Australia (POAMA). In this paper, the authors demonstrate that mean corrected superensembles formed by merging forecasts from POAMA with those from three international models in the ENSEMBLES dataset remain poorly calibrated in many cases. The authors propose and evaluate a two-step process for producing MMEs. First, forecast calibration of the individual GCMs is carried out by using Bayesian joint probability models that account for parameter uncertainty. The calibration leads to satisfactory forecast reliability. Second, the individually calibrated forecasts of the GCMs are merged through Bayesian model averaging (BMA). The use of multiple GCMs results in better forecast accuracy, while maintaining reliability, than using POAMA only. Compared with using equal-weight averaging, BMA weighting produces sharper and more accurate forecasts. | |
