Show simple item record

contributor authorHope, Pandora
contributor authorKeay, Kevin
contributor authorPook, Michael
contributor authorCatto, Jennifer
contributor authorSimmonds, Ian
contributor authorMills, Graham
contributor authorMcIntosh, Peter
contributor authorRisbey, James
contributor authorBerry, Gareth
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:30:38Z
date available2017-06-09T17:30:38Z
date copyright2014/01/01
date issued2013
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-86478.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4230040
description abstracthe identification of extratropical fronts in reanalyses and climate models is an important climate diagnostic that aids dynamical understanding and model verification. This study compares six frontal identification methods that are applied to June and July reanalysis data over the Central Wheatbelt of southwest Western Australia for 1979?2006. Much of the winter rainfall over this region originates from frontal systems. Five of the methods use automated algorithms. These make use of different approaches, based on shifts in 850-hPa winds (WND), gradients of temperature (TGR) and wet-bulb potential temperature (WPT), pattern matching (PMM), and a self-organizing map (SOM). The sixth method was a manual synoptic technique (MAN). On average, about 50% of rain days were associated with fronts in most schemes (although methods PMM and SOM exhibited a lower percentage). On a daily basis, most methods identify the same systems more than 50% of the time, and over the 28-yr period the seasonal time series correlate strongly. The association with rainfall is less clear. The WND time series of seasonal frontal counts correlate significantly with Central Wheatbelt rainfall. All automated methods identify fronts on some days that are classified as cutoff lows in the manual analysis, which will impact rainfall correlations. The front numbers identified on all days by the automated methods decline from 1979 to 2006 (but only the TGR and WPT trends were significant at the 10% level). The results here highlight that automated techniques have value in understanding frontal behavior and can be used to identify the changes in the frequency of frontal systems through time.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleA Comparison of Automated Methods of Front Recognition for Climate Studies: A Case Study in Southwest Western Australia
typeJournal Paper
journal volume142
journal issue1
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/MWR-D-12-00252.1
journal fristpage343
journal lastpage363
treeMonthly Weather Review:;2013:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record