Show simple item record

contributor authorGneiting, Tilmann
contributor authorRaftery, Adrian E.
contributor authorWestveld, Anton H.
contributor authorGoldman, Tom
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:26:50Z
date available2017-06-09T17:26:50Z
date copyright2005/05/01
date issued2005
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-85451.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4228899
description abstractEnsemble prediction systems typically show positive spread-error correlation, but they are subject to forecast bias and dispersion errors, and are therefore uncalibrated. This work proposes the use of ensemble model output statistics (EMOS), an easy-to-implement postprocessing technique that addresses both forecast bias and underdispersion and takes into account the spread-skill relationship. The technique is based on multiple linear regression and is akin to the superensemble approach that has traditionally been used for deterministic-style forecasts. The EMOS technique yields probabilistic forecasts that take the form of Gaussian predictive probability density functions (PDFs) for continuous weather variables and can be applied to gridded model output. The EMOS predictive mean is a bias-corrected weighted average of the ensemble member forecasts, with coefficients that can be interpreted in terms of the relative contributions of the member models to the ensemble, and provides a highly competitive deterministic-style forecast. The EMOS predictive variance is a linear function of the ensemble variance. For fitting the EMOS coefficients, the method of minimum continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) estimation is introduced. This technique finds the coefficient values that optimize the CRPS for the training data. The EMOS technique was applied to 48-h forecasts of sea level pressure and surface temperature over the North American Pacific Northwest in spring 2000, using the University of Washington mesoscale ensemble. When compared to the bias-corrected ensemble, deterministic-style EMOS forecasts of sea level pressure had root-mean-square error 9% less and mean absolute error 7% less. The EMOS predictive PDFs were sharp, and much better calibrated than the raw ensemble or the bias-corrected ensemble.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleCalibrated Probabilistic Forecasting Using Ensemble Model Output Statistics and Minimum CRPS Estimation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume133
journal issue5
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/MWR2904.1
journal fristpage1098
journal lastpage1118
treeMonthly Weather Review:;2005:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record