Show simple item record

contributor authorGreene, A. D.
contributor authorHendricks, P. J.
contributor authorGregg, M. C.
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:26:29Z
date available2017-06-09T17:26:29Z
date issued2017
identifier issn0739-0572
identifier otherams-85323.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4228758
description abstracthis note is a comment in response to Gargett (2016) which argues that a large-eddy estimate of turbulent dissipation rate using a horizontal length scale with a vertical velocity estimate, as in Greene et al. (2015), is a dubious approximation if the energy-containing eddies are anisotropic. A simulation of Langmuir cells and associated turbulence is used to support Gargett (2016) conclusions. This rebuttal reviews the approaches taken in Greene et al. (2015) and sites several instances of flawed reasoning in Gargett (2016). This includes using Langmuir simulations to support the primary conclusion of Gargett (2016), which seems unconnected to Greene et al. (2015) data and ignores a vast body of work on simulating Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities, widely considered to be the dominant mechanism producing stratified turbulence.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleResponse to “Comment on ”Using an ADCP to estimate turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in sheltered coastal waters“ by A.D. Greene, P.J. Hendricks, and M.C. Gregg” by Ann E. Gargett
typeJournal Paper
journal volume034
journal issue006
journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
identifier doi10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0154.1
journal fristpage1391
journal lastpage1392
treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2017:;volume( 034 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record